About Me

Name: TOTA
Location: Whittier, CA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama big fan of "hill people", Ayers black hole

Obama's sympathy for the poor is bound-less because every need he can identify and address is another group of clients for the state.

According to Kathleen Parker's newest article, Obama has a special place in his heart for the Appalachian 'hill people'. Let's be serious. Obama's mentor thinks whites are the enemy (at least Jews, anyway, by his own words). We know what Obama thinks about PA whites, he must think the poor Appalachians are living in caves and still trying to get a grip on 'fire'.

Obama is not evil. He is a selective perfectionist. He sees gross imperfections in the world and he cannot abide them. This is a fine mindset for a charity worker or a law enforcement officer, but not for someone with aspirations to great power.
The world is by nature imperfect; the evolutionist atheists on the left ought to embrace the process whereby the strong survive and the herd is culled, but they do everything they can to retard it (the rest of us care for the unfortunate because they are God's children). Those who believe themselves creations can abide the world's imperfection; this imperfection is not a dead end, and is necessary for the existence of real love, which depends upon a willingness to suffer. Those who accept reality can also abide imperfection, knowing that trying to eradicate it often makes things worse, or creates new problems. But not the leftist - he must agitate to tear down the foundations of the very land upon which he stands because it is not perfect.
It would be one thing if the leftists were willing to explicitly lay out what they want to do, as a few brave souls have done. But they have to wrap their intentions in words that mask their actual desires - they know that people don't want what they want, so they hide it and try to fool people. By doing so they subvert democracy. Republicans lie, but they aren't lying about their basic intentions.
***********************************

Obama's interview with Gibson was laughable. Of course these items are handled as "some on the right are saying", or "McCain is attacking you by saying". When these issues are addressed, Obama is given an out right off the bat - it's clearly all irrelevant and political, only the right gives a fig about it.
The public knows more about Todd Palin's 22 year old DUI than they know about a half dozen Obama black holes: Ayers, Khalidi, Raines and Johnson, Fannie/Freddie money, and Obama and Ayers pissing $110 million down the drain with their activist handling of the Annenberg Challenge.
There's a reason, of course. If taxpayers know the garbage that Obama approved in his stewardship of the AC, whilst rejecting fundamental study areas like math and science, he would not win the election. This is his only executive experience, where he was able to make decisions, and they were about Obama and politics first, a lot of other things, and finally, about quality education.

Fear not: Their answers to the Ayers thing will not hold. They're saying now that Obama didn't know Ayers was a terrorist when he went to his house to launch his demagoguery. That's absurd on its face. He says he assumed Ayers had repented - is it really conceivable that he never discussed this with anyone? Ayers was clear and adamant about his virtue, saying he would to it all over again, only better.

Here are the first two clear lessons learned from this:
1. The fact that Ayers is a 'respected figure' in Chicago politics and a professor there tells us only that Chicago politics is extraordinarily radical, not that Ayers is not a radical marxist. Apparently, you can be anything other than a conservative and find some place in Chicago politics. There is a reason Alinsky (sp? - who cares, he's a monster) chose Chicago, and he clearly planted seeds there. It was the Alinsky people who brought Obama there to work, once Obama was determined to go there because it was so radical.
2. It will not matter what the bulk of Obama's supporters come to believe about Ayers, it will be irrelevant. They will still support the man. Even if the once anticipated Michelle Obama "whitey" tape actually appears, most of their supporters won't care, and will think the right is evil for bringing it out. In short, the bulk of Obama's supporters have motivations that transcend national cohesion, national security, and common sense.

TOTA

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reuters: Palin's Troubles Mount (Thanks Parker)

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE48S8JW20080929?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=10279

Kathleen Parker wrote an article that was otherwise not worth reading except that 1. it appeared in National Review, and 2. She called on Palin to step down.
Now the old media are using Parker to bludgeon Palin. The Reuters article cites three elements that paint a troubling picture for Palin. 1. Tasergate 2. The media have piled on 3. 'Conservatives' are starting to pile on.

THAT IS IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There is no Reuters article without Kathleen Parker's stupid piece.  "Tasergate" is a left wing lynching, and old news, and no one takes seriously a media article saying a politician is in trouble because the media is piling on her. There is no article without Parker. Brooks has zero credibility with conservatives, they couldn't have done it with him alone. Parker doesn't either, especially after this, but now Reuters had two names to throw in - National Review and Brooks.

Is this what Parker pictured unfolding? How about an apology for throwing blood in the water when the old media fish were already circling? Parker owes Gov. Palin a tearful apology. It matters not a whit that she thinks she was speaking truth. NO GOOD COULD COME OF IT so it amounts to piling on a good person who has already been mercilessly abused.

Now as the media sharks are using Parker to try and destroy Palin, Parker continues to try to justify herself, but she knows now that what she did was narcissistic and destructive, not to mention incredibly stupid and ill-advised, assuming she actually wants to see a republican president.

Did she suppose that McCain might actually dump her? NO MATTER THE STATED REASON that is what people would perceive if she left. He's going to throw away all of the interest generated among women? Does he put another woman on the ticket? Anything Mac would do would look like naked voter manipulation, or would be resented, or both. Parker is THOUGHTLESS or MAD. The only winning scenario if Palin leaves is if the public loves her so much that they punish the democrats and the press for the abominable treatment of her. Not likely. It would probably be seen as a vindication of their nastiness.

The left now loves Parker, and most of the right would rather never hear another word from her, ever. If Obama wins and this Parker insanity plays any role in it, she's the new Tokyo Rose.

TOTA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »