About Me

Name: TOTA
Location: Whittier, CA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

THE UNASKED HEALTH CARE QUESTIONS

Few conservatives are naive enough to expect the old media to actually do their jobs, and report accurately on health care legislation. The old media act like the participants in Obama's fake 'town halls'.
Thankfully, some Americans are asking questions of their public servants directly. Here are a few questions that no one is asking, but should:

1. The cost of laser eye surgery and most kinds of cosmetic surgeries have dropped over the last few decades. Ironically, most of the time people pay for these procedures out of their own pockets. Is there be a connection?

2. The population of the US is expected to grow from the current approximately 300 million people to 450 million people in the next 40-50 years. It's conceivable that a less fettered private sector could meet the additional medical demand (on top of the aging baby-boomers), but are the prospects good that a system with more government involvement and control will meet the challenge? Is the fact that the house bill goes in the other direction - making it more difficult to build new hospitals - a hopeful sign?

3. The drug companies appear to have thrown in with Obama completely. Much has been made of the possibility of back room deals regarding prices. But another question is pertinent: Is it possible that the drug companies see the possibility of greater drug use under Obamacare? Fewer procedures and surgeries will mean more need for palliative drugs and painkillers.

4. The President has made a major issue of wasted care and tests, at one time pointing to $2 trillion in possible savings. In order to realize these savings, the house bill gives the government the power to set prices and determine what care private insurance companies will charge and offer. Similar determinations will have to be made in the public sphere - eliminating 'unnecessary' tests and procedures. In order to determine which care is or is not cost-effective for society, the house legislation creates a five person appointed panel to review the effectiveness of tests and procedures. Now, there is little doubt that knee and hip replacements are effective - in almost all cases they provide profound relief to their recipients, every day for the rest of their lives. So that is not really the question this panel will address. They will be charged with determining how best to allocate 'scarce' medical  resources in the most cost-effective way. The 60-year-old CEO's knee replacement is cost effective for society - thousands of jobs depend on his stewardship. Not so, demented aunt Sarah. This is the 'death panel' provision. It's a panel, and it will make decisions about which ages and classes of people receive life-saving care - life and death decisions. So the only real question is this: Do we call it a life panel, a life and death panel, or a death panel?

5. Will we be allowed to beg? And will they enjoy it?

Greg Buls

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time running out for GOP on energy issue

At the moment, the GOP has a virtual monopoly on the energy issue. That won't last long; reports of Democrat lawmakers returning from weekends with constituents don't bode well for the GOP. Some Democrats are getting the message. The GOP must act now if they are going to see this issue save their hides in November. Talk of likely democrat pick-ups in both houses is grossly premature, the uber-issue has yet to be addressed to the satisfaction of voters, much less resolved. This is the GOP's big chance, if they have their wits about them they will seize it.

Specifically, an election contract should be drawn up, in short order. Everyone knows what we need to do, so let's codify it, and put it in front of the voters in a way that can't be ignored. Spend most of the GOP money in the bank advertising it, promote it on TV, radio, and the web. Have legislators and candidates, including McCain, sign it, so that voters know that the legislators who sign this contract are committed to actually doing something about energy prices, while those who have not are committed to dreaming. Properly framed and promoted, this could be the major question in the voting booth this fall: "Which one of these candidates supports the Free America Energy Plan?"

It seems only fair to allow Democrat politicians on board, but let's get on with it already, GOP, the longer you wait, the more of them will be standing in line to clamor about how they've been for drilling all along. Their idiots at the top are all off in lala land, so let's get on with this now while a crystal clear distinction can still be made. If not, we can count on this still being a significant issue in November outside of the looniest districts, but then, the general Democrat line will be, "I had some environmental concerns, but after visiting blah blah blah, I'm convinced that we can do this in an environmentally friendly way. Of course the only way to make sure the drilling we all want happens in a 'smart' and 'responsible' way is to elect more Democrats."

GOP, if you can't recognize a gift horse when it is served up on a silver platter, you are a precursor to something; your will is no longer sufficient to carry you for long in this brave new world. If roles were reversed, and the Democrats could make hay by advocating something the vast majority of Americans actually wants, we'd be wallowing in hay. GOP: Whatever else you are doing can WAIT. This is the most important thing on the itinerarty; it is the itinerary for all intents and purposes.

Is it possible that this simple idea has not occurred to the powers that be in the GOP? Not likely. So what explains the lack of action on it? Don't bother explaining, GOP, just act. Don't tell us about legislation being drawn up in the house and senate, do this first, then propose the legislation. Can't get everyone together in a big room for long enough to hammer this out? Then put your top guys on it and have them ride herd on the rest of the GOP, and make sure every GOP challenger signs on. It's go time; the light is green.

TOTA


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »